Capability

Semantic and policy judgment

Meaning and policy interpretation are assigned to a named authority boundary rather than inferred from model output.

This capability separates what a model produced from what a governed authority accepted as meaningful.

Outcome, not repository

Problem and intended result

  1. 01

    Customer problem

    Model output alone cannot determine which facts, policies, or interpretations are authoritative.

  2. 02

    Intended outcome

    A decision record can distinguish advisory output from the authority that judged it.

  3. 03

Evidence boundary

Expected evidence and explicit limits

Evidence produced

  • Semantic plans and cited authority
  • Policy judgments and human-gate records

Limitations

  • Model output remains advisory unless a named authority promotes it.
  • Technical judgment does not become legal advice or a compliance determination.

Integration posture

Prerequisites

  • Named semantic or policy authority
  • Explicit promotion requirements

Review integration boundaries